Appeal against interim maintenance award dismissed at hearing stage. Court rejected appellants' evidence of second marriage due to identity discrepancies and held the maintenance amount was not arbitrary.
Appeal dismissed at the stage of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 127 of 2018
Appellant :- Gopal Singh Respondent :- Smt. Renu Counsel for Appellant :- Ram Neta Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Order Date :- 23.2.2018 AK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the alleged second marriage of the respondent, established by documents showing 'Renu Devi', is sufficient to disqualify her from receiving interim maintenance awarded under Section 24 of Hind
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Gopal Singh
Smt. Renu
Sudhir Agarwal
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sudhir Agarwal and Shashi Kant
Parties & counsel
