This appeal challenges a dismissal for want of prosecution regarding an application for condonation of delay. The court held the appeal barred by limitation and dismissed it.
Appeal dismissed for being barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 68 of 2016 Appellant :- Om Prakash Katehriya Respondent :- ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Avadhesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Prashant Verma
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 68 of 2016 Appellant :- Om Prakash Katehriya Respondent :- ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Avadhesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Prashant Verma
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant, J.
The application, seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal, having been dismissed vide order of date, this appeal, being barred by limitation, is also dismissed.
Dt. 23.02.2018 PS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application seeking condonation of delay, having been dismissed, bars a subsequent appeal by limitation?
Whether the appeal in condonation of delay is maintainable?
Om Prakash Katehriya
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Sudhir Agarwal
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
