This court dismissed an appeal against the dismissal of an application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, ruling the appeal time-barred. No appearance was made by the appellant to press the application.
The appeal was dismissed as it was barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 547 of 1998
Appellant :- Union Of India & Another Respondent :- Smt. Tarawati Mahlay & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Govind Saran,C.S.C.(Uoi),Harindra Prasad
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
( Order on Application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act)
Order Date :- 24.1.2018/Mukesh
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 547 of 1998
Appellant :- Union Of India & Another Respondent :- Smt. Tarawati Mahlay & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Govind Saran,C.S.C.(Uoi),Harindra Prasad
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
The application seeking condonation of delay for filing appeal having been rejected vide order of date, this appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 24.1.2018/Mukesh
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the rejection of condonation of delay is barred by limitation.
How the limitation bar was applied when no party appeared to press the application.
The disposal of an appeal filed after the limitation period without condonation of delay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union Of India
Smt. Tarawati Mahlay
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
