The High Court dismissed the first appeal from a defective order. The court observed that no defect remains except the certificate of deposit and noted the delay of about 17 years in removing the alleged defect. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The first appeal against the order deficient in due form was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 173 of 2001
Appellant :- Ram Chand Lal And Others Respondent :- Smt. Bhunesh Kumar And Others Counsel for Appellant :- A.K.Sachan
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Order Date :- 24.1.2018 Mukesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal filed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 regarding a defective defect certificate should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Chand Lal And Others
Smt. Bhunesh Kumar And Others
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
