An appeal filed by U.P.S.R.T.C. was dismissed on 25.1.2018 as it was barred by limitation, as a prior application for condonation of delay had been rejected.
The appeal was dismissed as being barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Civil Misc. Application No. Nil of 1998
IN
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No.483 of 1998 Appellant :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Respondent :- Smt. Asha Devi & Others Counsel for Appellant :- V.P. Mathur
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
This is an appeal of the year 1998 and we are in the year 2018.
Though notices were issued to the respondents, no steps seems to have been taken by the appellant. The matter is also unattended.
None has appeared for the appellant today.
Hence, I have no other option but to dismiss the application as Sri V.P. Mathur does not appear for the U.P.S.R.T.C. any longer.
Order Date :- 25.1.2018
Irshad
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 483 of 1998
Appellant :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Respondent :- Smt. Asha Devi & Others Counsel for Appellant :- V.P. Mathur
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Since this appeal has been filed beyond time and application seeking condonation of delay has been rejected vide order of date, this appeal stands dismissed being barred by limitation.
Order Date :- 25.1.2018 Irshad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is barred by limitation since the application for condonation of delay was rejected.
U.P.S.R.T.C.
Smt. Asha Devi
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
