A single judge dismissed the delay condonation application for want of prosecution due to the absent narrative. Consequently, the first appeal also stands dismissed.
Delay condonation application and appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 431 of 2011 Appellant :- Sajida Bano & Others Respondent :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Ltd. Thru' G.M./R.M. & Another Counsel for Appellant :- Mansoor Ahmad
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Ref:- Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 89816 of 2011
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the appellants-applicants to press this application.
It appears that the applicants-appellants are no more interested in pursuing the delay condonation application.
The delay condonation application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
In view of the dismissal of the delay condonation application, the appeal also stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.7.2018 Atmesh
Court No. - 26
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 431 of 2011
Appellant :- Sajida Bano & Others Respondent :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Ltd. Thru' G.M./R.M. & Another Counsel for Appellant :- Mansoor Ahmad
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Dismissed.
For order, see order of date passed on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 89816 of 2011.
Order Date :- 18.7.2018
Atmesh
Sajida Bano & Others
U.P.S.R.T.C. Ltd. Thru' G.M./R.M. & Another
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
