Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the matter. The court observed the appellant was not interested in pursuing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 844 of 2013
Appellant :- Smt. Manorama Sharma Respondent :- Ram Kishor Tiwari And Others Counsel for Appellant :- M.K. Gupta, R.K.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Shiv Bahadur Yadav, Sri Raj Karan Tripathi
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List Revised. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal.
It appears that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing the appeal.
Appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.7.2018 RCY/Rohit
Smt. Manorama Sharma
Ram Kishor Tiwari And Others
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
