Single judge dismissed the first appeal from order defective for want of prosecution since the application seeking condonation of delay was also dismissed by a previous order, barring the appeal by limitation.
The appeal is dismissed as it is barred by limitation following the dismissal of the condonation of delay application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 128 of 2001
Appellant :- Simmi Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Shiv Charan And Another Counsel for Appellant :- A.K.Jain
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
(Ref: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application) 1. Called in revised. None appeared to press this application.
Order Date :- 10.1.2018/DKS
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 128 of 2001 Appellant :- Simmi Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Shiv Charan And Another Counsel for Appellant :- A.K.Jain
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Since application seeking condonation of delay in filing this appeal has been dismissed vide order of date, the appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 10.1.2018/DKS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable now that the condonation of delay application has been dismissed.
Simmi Kumar Gupta
Shiv Charan
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
