The court dismissed a first appeal from an order defective file, No. 114 of 1999, noting that the appellant, Union of India, had left the appeal unattended since 1999, indicating a lack of interest to continue it.
The appeal filed in 1999 was dismissed due to inactivity and lack of interest by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 114 of 1999
Appellant :- Union Of India And Anr. Respondent :- S.M. Ilyas Counsel for Appellant :- Govind Saran,Harindra Prasad,Uoi(Csc)
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
(In Ref. : Civil Misc. Application No. Nil of 1999)
The delay, which is minimal, is condoned.
The application is allowed.
Order Date :- 29.1.2018 Irshad
Court No. - 27
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 114 of 1999
Appellant :- Union Of India And Anr. Respondent :- S.M. Ilyas Counsel for Appellant :- Govind Saran,Harindra Prasad,Uoi(Csc)
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
The defective appeal is lying before this Court unattended since 1999 which shows that Union of India is no longer interested in continuing this appeal any more.
The appeal is dismissed.
Order Date :- 29.1.2018 Irshad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the defective appeal filed by the Union of India in 1999 should be dismissed due to inactivity.
Union Of India
S.M. Ilyas
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
