The High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed by Ashok Kumar as withdrawn by the counsel. The Court noted it has not touched upon the merits of the case.
Criminal revision dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 664 of 2017
Revisionist :- Ashok Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Binod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Learned counsel for the revisionist states that he wants to withdraw the criminal revision and it may be dismissed as such.
Accordingly, the criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn without liberty to the revisionist to file fresh revision for the same cause of action with similar prayer.
The revisionist, if so advised, may file proceeding under Chapter XV of Code of Criminal Procedure against the accused. It is made clear that this Court has not touched upon the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 29.3.2018 MN/-
State Of U.P.
Raju Bhargava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
