present revisionists for the reasons best known to him. He further added that upon consideration of the entirety of the claim so founded by way of lodging the FIR and coming to know about the actual reality, the Investigating Officer was justified in filing the final report. The quint essence of the conclusion of final report was based on fact that not a single person viewed the incident and there is no independent corroboration of the claim of the informant that the deceased was assaulted by the accused. On the contrary, claim of the revisionists that the deceased met with accidental death and this fact was confirmed by the villagers. Next, contended that once the protest petition was not acted upon, then it was beyond power of the court below to have taken cognizance on imagination and guess work. Medical examination itself is supportive of fact that it is an accidental death that should have formed basis of the impugned order and the cogniznce would not have been taken because a person may tell a lie, but the circumstance in the form of medical evidence regarding injuries sustained
