The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no petitioner counsel appeared to argue on 14.5.2018. Any interim order issued earlier was vacated.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; any interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3673 of 2015
Petitioner :- Sukh Chand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate,B.R.Sharma
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
List revised. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to argue this case.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 14.5.2018 Manish Tripathi
Sukh Chand
State Of U.P.
Another
Umesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
