This writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance, resulting in no substantive adjudication on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16172 of 2012
Petitioner :- Sikandar Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Maurya,Sheo Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Anil Kant Tripathi
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
List revised. None is present for the petitioner.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 14.5.2018 Manish Tripathi
Sikandar Chauhan
State Of U.P.
Umesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
