The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous because the charge-sheet had been submitted in the underlying case, rendering the petition no longer viable. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 366 of 2018
Petitioner :- Gendia Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Srivastava,Laxmi Kant Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Sri Vikas Sahai, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Learned A.G.A. for the State has submitted that chare-sheet has been submitted in the present case, hence the present petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Krishna Pratap Singh,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Order Date :- 26.2.2018 A.K.Verma
Gendia Devi
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Krishna Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
