Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are family members of co-accused Rahul Agarwal and have been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the marriage between respondent no.4 and son of petitioner no.3, namely, Rahul Agarwal was solemnized on 1.9.2017 and after marriage some differences arose between the husband and wife, on account of which respondent no.4 has lodged the impugned FIR roping her husband including his entire family containing absolutely false, concocted, vague and sweeping allegations against them that they were demanding dowry from her and her parents and on account of non fulfilment of the alleged demands of dowry she was being tortured and maltreated by them in her matrimonial home. It has next been submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the FIR no credible evidence whatsoever is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the petitioners' complicity in the commission of the alleged offence, hence the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed.
