The writ petition was dismissed in default due to lack of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3235 of 2004
Petitioner :- Bihari & Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.K. Tripathi,Achal Singh Vats,Satish Chand Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,M.N. Singh,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
1-None is present on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute this case even in the revised list/call.
2-Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
3-Inter order, if any, stands vacated.
4-Copy of this order be transmitted to the court concerned to proceed in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 11.9.2018 OP
Bihari
State Of U.P.
Aniruddha Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
