Allowed

Inamul Haq v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Sept 2018BAIL/29519/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail application before Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. - 29519 of 2018, dismissed the bail prayer to the State but allowed it. The applicant was arrested with beef and instruments under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant contended recovery was false. The court held it was a fit case for bail subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to standard bail conditions.

Inamul Haq Vs State of U.P. — Caste Atrocities | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 41

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29519 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Inamul Haq Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shams Uz Zaman Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶5

Supplementary and counter affidavits filed today is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

According to the prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against five accused persons namely, Inamul Haq, Asarar, Navab, Shaukeen and Furkan alleging that on 30.5.2018, accused Inamul Haq was arrested by the police and recovered 30 Kg. beef, some instruments for slaughtering & other materials and other accused persons fled away.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that recovery is false and planted. There is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. There is no independent witness against the applicant. Nothing was recovered from the possession of applicant. The applicant is innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 30.5.2018 (near about three and half months) having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no criminal history.

¶10

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Inamul Haq involved in Case Crime No. 286 of 2018, under Section 3/5/8 Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Sambhal, District Sambhal be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶12

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during

¶13

the trial.

¶14

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶15

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶16

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶17

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 10.9.2018

¶20

A. Singh

Inamul Haq v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Inamul Haq v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Shankar Lal Srivastava Vs State and Others

Abhay Kumar Dixit Vs State of U.P.and Others

Lal Chandra Jain Vs State of U.P. and Others

Abdul Hamid and Another Vs State of U.P. and Others

Radhey Shyam and Another Vs State of U.P. and Others

Sonoo Bajpai Vs State of U.P. and Others