Husna Bano Smt. and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The special leave petition, needing no appearance from the Petitioner, was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance.
The special leave petition, needing no appearance from the Petitioner, was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20293 of 2017
Petitioner :- Husna Bano (Smt.) & 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition. Sri Vikas Sahai, learned AGA for the State is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Krishna Pratap Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 15.3.2018/NS
Husna Bano
State Of U.P.
Krishna Pratap Singh
Ramesh Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court