Ruksana v. State of U.P. and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5078 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ruksana Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Asif Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
An affidavit of compliance has been filed, which is taken on record.
Heard Sri Mohd. Asif, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vikas Sahai, learned A.G.A. for the State.
In compliance of the Court's order dated 09.03.2018, Senior Superintendent of Police Aligarh, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey, who is also present in the Court has filed an affidavit of compliance. Learned A.G.A. for the State has submitted that in para No.8 of the affidavit of compliance, it has been stated that the victim girl has been recovered and the accused, namely Ram Kumar @ Bajrangi has been arrested on 13.03.2018 and in this regard entry has been mentioned in G.D. No.15 dated 14.03.2018 copy of which has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the affidavit. The S.S.P.Aligarh has stated that victim girl has been produced before the C.J.M.Aligarh today in Aligarh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he has no instruction about this fact.
It is directed that after recording the Statement before the C.J.M. Aligarh, the victim girl may be handed over to her parents and presence of the S.S.P. Aligarh is hereby dispensed with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ruksana
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Krishna Pratap Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/5078/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court