The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed by the High Court for lack of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel did not appear to press the petition on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12083 of 2005
Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Mishra,Gaya Prasad Pal,S.C. Dwivedi,V.B. Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Hari Prakash Mishra
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned immediately to proceed with the case in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 30.8.2018 NS
Ashok Kumar
State Of U.P.
Aniruddha Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
