Allowed

Gulsher v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC30 Aug 2018BAIL/33176/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed bail to the applicant, Gulsher, involved in a cow slaughter FIR. The court noted the co-accused was already granted bail, the applicant had no criminal history, and was not arrested on the spot. He was ordered to execute a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions.

Gulsher Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 41

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33176 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Gulsher Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sayeed Saif Ullah,Sufia Saba Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

According to the prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against four accused persons namely Tausif, Muda, Gulsher, Kala and two unknown persons alleging that on 20.6.2018, one slaughtered cow, and some instruments for slaughtering were recovered from the place of occurrence and all accused persons fled away.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that recovery is false and planted. Co-accused namely Tausif has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 21.8.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31744 of 2018, since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail. There is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. Applicant was not arrested on the spot. There is no independent witness against the applicant. Nothing was recovered from the possession of applicant. The applicant is innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 21.6.2018 (more than two months) having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶8

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no criminal history.

¶9

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Gulsher involved in Case Crime No. 166 of 2018, under Section 379, 411 IPC and Section 3/5A/8 Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Behat, District Saharanpur be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the

¶11

satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶12

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶13

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶14

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶15

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶16

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 30.8.2018

¶19

A. Singh

Gulsher v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulsher v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Nasima and Another Vs State of U.P.

Ghaffor Vs State and Others

Jog Pal Singh and Another Vs IV Asj and Ohters

Jag Mohan Singh Vs State

Badlu and Another Vs State of U.P.

Ashok Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Others