In this contempt application, the court noted that the applicant's representation had been disposed of on merits in an earlier order dated 15 May 2018. Consequently, the current petition was disposed of.
Petition disposed of as nothing further survives after earlier order on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2179 of 2018
Applicant :- Buddhiram Chaudhary Opposite Party :- D.B. Singh, Regional Manager Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the opposite party and has filed an affidavit of compliance which is taken on record.
The Court notes that in terms of the order dated 15 May 2018, the representation of the applicant has been duly attended to and disposed of on merits.
Consequently nothing further survives on this petition which shall stand disposed of .
Order Date :- 25.5.2018 LA/-
Buddhiram Chaudhary
D.B. Singh
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
