Akram v. State of U.P.

Court No. - 23

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8870 of 2018

Applicant :- Akram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar,learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant is not named in the FIR. His name came into light during the course of investigation. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant or at his pointing out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.9.2017. It is next contended that one case has also been slapped on the applicant being case crime No.375 of 2017, under sections 395, 412 I.P.C., in which he has been granted bail by the court below, as averred in paragraph 10 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application.