Allowed

Saiyad Rashid Ali v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Mar 2018BAIL/2222/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Vivek Kumar Singh allowed bail to Saiyad Rashid Ali charged with cheating and forgery under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 406, 504, and 506 IPC, citing reasons including false implication, lack of criminal history, and reformative theory of punishment.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail furnishing personal bond with two sureties on conditions of appearing in court, not tampering with witnesses, and not indulging in illegal activities.

Saiyad Rashid Ali Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2222 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Saiyad Rashid Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Tewari,Sanjay Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Counter affidavit filed by the learned A.G.A. today in the Court is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶7

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant has not committed the offence in question. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 1.8.2017. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶10

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Saiyad Rashid Ali involved in Case Crime No.1093 of 2017, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Qwarsi, District Aligarh be released on bail on his

¶11

furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶12

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶13

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶14

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶15

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 8.3.2018 Dev/-

Saiyad Rashid Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saiyad Rashid Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhu Chaudhary Vs State of U.P.

Ashwani Mishra @ Pullu Mishra Vs State of U.P.

manoj sharma Vs State of U.P.

Babloo Vs State of U.P.

Omji Chaubey Vs State of U.P.

Sushil Gaba Vs State of U.P.