Allowed

Anil Kumar Parmar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Feb 2018BAIL/7054/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal case involving cheating and criminal conspiracy, emphasizing that the applicant is ready to cooperate and has no prior criminal history, while issuing standard conditions to prevent witness tampering and ensuring court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, subject to specified conditions.

Anil Kumar Parmar Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7054 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Anil Kumar Parmar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Govind Saran Hajela Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Govind Saran Hajela, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Poonam Singh Sengar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant was not named in the first information report, which itself create doubt regarding the participation of the applicant in the alleged offence. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 27.12.2017. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Anil Kumar Parmar involved in Case Crime No.1387 of 2017, under Sections 420, 406, 120-B, 411 I.P.C., Police Station

¶10

Sikandara, District Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶11

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 23.2.2018 Dev/-

Anil Kumar Parmar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Parmar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karunesh Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Karunesh Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Bushra Aslam Vs State of U.P.

Madan Rajpoot Vs State of U.P.

Aalok Singh @ Rishu Vs State of U.P.

Gaurav Vaishya Vs State of U.P.