Jaipal Alias Karuwa v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application, the court granted bail to the applicant charged with offences under Sections 392 and 411 IPC. The court allowed release on personal bond with two sureties, directing that the applicant must cooperate in the trial and not tamper with witnesses or engage in illegal activities.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted on personal bond with two sureties, each in a sum to the satisfaction of the concerned court.
What the court decided
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5664 of 2018
Applicant :- Jaipal Alias Karuwa Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Vishvakarma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Arun Kumar Vishvakarma, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri M.R. Khan, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that applicant was not named in the first information report. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant and a false recovery of two motorcycle Apache, 2 ring, 1 Mangalsutra, four gold chain, Rs. 16000/- has been shown from the possession of the applicant, which is planted. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 03.11.2017. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent but the arrest of applicant he has been falsely roped in the some other cases which has been properly explained in para 5 of the affidavit file in support of bail application.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 437 CrPC considering the severity of charges and prima facie satisfaction of the court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jaipal Alias Karuwa
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/5664/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court