Allowed

Zulfekar Ali v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC3 Jan 2018BAIL/50815/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420 IPC, subject to personal bond with two sureties and standard bail conditions to prevent tampering with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on personal bond with two sureties on conditions of attending trial, not tampering with witnesses, and not indulging in illegal activities.

Zulfekar Ali Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50815 of 2017

¶3

Applicant :- Zulfekar Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mirza Ali Zulfaqar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Mirza Ali Zulfaqar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Prabhash Pandey, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that neither the applicant has been arrested on the alleged place of occurrence nor any incriminating aricles or illegal motorcycle have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been place forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail 26.05.2017.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Let the applicant Zulfekar Ali involved in Case Crime No. 372 of 2017, under Section 411, 413, 414, 420 I.P.C., Police Station Bilaspur, District Rampur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶11

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶12

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶13

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶14

Order Date :- 3.1.2018 Arti Sharma

Zulfekar Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zulfekar Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dheeraj Kumar @ Kallu Vs State of U.P.

Suraj Vs State of U.P.

Mansoor @ Muda Vs State of U.P.

Nadeem Akhtar Vs State of U.P.

Chand Ashad Kureshi Vs State of U.P.

Monu @ Larua Vs State of U.P.