Application for bail in a POSCO case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to prolonged pendency without movement, indicating loss of applicant's interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46509 of 2015
Applicant :- Deepak Prajapati Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Agarwal,Chandrakesh Mishra,Daya Shankar Mishra,Nirvikalp Pandey,Prateek Sinha,Radhey Shyam Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer that the applicant may be admitted to bail in Case Crime No.198 of 2015 under sections 376/328 IPC read with ¾ POSCO Act, Police Station Bitoor, District Kanpur Nagar.
The instant bail application has been filed in the year 2015. It cannot be allowed to swing years together in the cloak of pendency. Mere pendency of the bail application cannot accrue any right in favour of the applicant. It appears that the applicant has lost his interest in pursuing the matter. The application is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. Office is directed to communicate this order to the court below within a week through FAX. The court below shall proceed with the matter, expeditiously, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 25.10.2018
Naim
Deepak Prajapati
Naheed Ara Moonis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
