Tarun v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court granted bail to applicant Tarun in a cheating and forgery case, relying on parity with a co-accused bail order and lack of criminal history, subject to standard conditions.
What did the court decide?
Released on personal bonds with two sureties each under specified conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 459 of 2018
Applicant :- Tarun Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Anurag Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the coaccused Arun Singh ha been granted bail by another Bench of this Court on 7.3.2017 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8537 of 2017, a copy of said order has been annexed as annexure-5 to the affidavit accompanying this bail application, hence the case of the applicant stands of identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail on the ground of parity with a co-accused who was earlier granted bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tarun
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/459/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court