Allowed

Robin v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Feb 2018BAIL/4133/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4133 of 2018, this court granted bail to the applicant, Robin, who alleged false implication in a theft and cheating case under Sections 379 and 411 IPC. The court emphasized prima facie satisfaction of the charge and readiness to cooperate, ordering bail on a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like amount.

Robin Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4133 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Robin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Desh Ratan Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Desh Ratan Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The first information report has been lodged against unknown persons. The allegations made in the first information report against the applicant, are absolutely false and concocted. There is no independent public witness to corroborate the prosecution version. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. The applicant has no criminal antecedents.

¶7

Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 31.7.2017.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶10

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Robin involved in Case Crime No. 727 of 2017, under Sections 379, 411 I.P.C. at Police Station Baraut, District Baghpat, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of

¶11

the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶12

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶13

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶14

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶15

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 12.2.2018 Siddhant Sahu

Robin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Robin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Vs State of U.P.

Atif @ Ranu Vs State of U.P.

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Nadeem Vs State of U.P.

Chhedi Lal Yadav Vs State of U.P.

raju Vs State of U.P.