Allowed

Chhedi Lal Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 Feb 2018BAIL/1616/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1616 of 2018, the Single Judge granted bail to the applicant, Chhedi Lal Yadav, involved in an FIR regarding cheating and forgery, releasing him on a personal bond with sureties subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions of attending trial and not tampering with witnesses.

Chhedi Lal Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1616 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Chhedi Lal Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the co-accused, Bechan Yadav has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 2.2.2018. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 25.10.2017. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Chhedi Lal Yadav involved in Case Crime No. 378 of 2017, under Section 419, 420, 421, 406, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Baansgaon, District Gorakhpur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the

¶11

trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 12.2.2018 Siddhant Sahu

Chhedi Lal Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhedi Lal Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Vs State of U.P.

Atif @ Ranu Vs State of U.P.

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Nadeem Vs State of U.P.

raju Vs State of U.P.

Robin Vs State of U.P.