Allowed

Ankit Mishra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Nov 2018BAIL/38035/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous bail application, the single judge allowed the release of the accused Ankit Mishra on bail in a cheating and forgery case involving IPC Sections 411, 419, 420, 467, 471, and 414, after perusing the material and considering the applicant's innocence and lack of prior criminal history.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court.

Ankit Mishra Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 42

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38035 of 2018 Applicant :- Ankit Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shridhar Tripathi,Pradeep Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

¶4

Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, the same is taken on record.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State of U.P and perused the material available on record.

¶6

Contention raised on behalf of the applicant has been confined to the extent that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Similarly circumstanced co-accused Ramu Pasi and Anuj Pandey have been admitted to bail by this Court vide orders dated 26.9.2018 and 27.9.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.36520 of 2018 and 36998 of 2018. A copy of the said orders has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in the paragraph no.4 of the supplementary affidavit filed in support of the bail application.The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.8.2018. The applicant undertakes that if he is admitted to bail, he will neither abscond nor misuse the liberty so granted to him.

¶7

Learned AGA has opposed prayer for bail. However, he has not disputed the aforesaid facts.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶9

Accordingly, bail application is allowed .

¶10

Let the applicant - Ankit Mishra involved in Case Crime No.336 of 2018, under Sections – 411, 419, 420, 467, 471, 414 I.P.C., Police Station - Manjhanpur, District – Kaushambi be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶11

Order Date :- 20.11.2018 S Rawat

Ankit Mishra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankit Mishra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Sajiwan Vs State of U.P.

Shiva Ji Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Sarvendra Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Kalawati Singh Vs State of U.P.

Tarun Alias Bhura Vs State of U.P.

Aslam Vs State of U.P.