In the absence of the applicant who failed to appear to press this second bail application, the court rejected the application noting that either the trial concluded or the applicant lacked interest, while liberty was retained to move a recall application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34376 of 2015
Applicant :- Lav Kush Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Case taken up in the revised list. None is present to press this bail application. Learned A.G.A. is present.
This is second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first bail application was rejected by this court vide order dated 02.12.2014, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7619 of 2014.
It appears that either the trial has concluded or the applicant is not interested to pursue his bail application.
Accordingly, the second bail application is rejected.
However, the applicant is at liberty to move a recall application, in case, the trial is not concluded.
Order Date :- 23.2.2018 sailesh
Lav Kush
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
