Bail application against Section 498A IPC charge rejected for want of prosecution as no party appeared to press the application after prolonged adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23111 of 2013
Applicant :- Chhote Lal Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- R.D. Dauholia Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
By means of this application, the applicants who are involved in Case Crime No. 178 of 2013, under Section 498A, 304B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Kotwali Talbehat, District Lalitpur, are seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
Case taken up in the revised list. No one is present to press this bail application. Learned A.G.A. is present.
On 24.10.2013, the case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the applicants and since then, the case is lying dormant.
It appears that either the trial has concluded or the applicants are not interested to press this bail application.
Accordingly, the bail application is rejected for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.2.2018
sailesh
Chhote Lal Yadav And Another
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
