Sonu Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed due to non-appearance of applicant's counsel and pendency of the case.
What the court decided
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33911 of 2017
Applicant :- Sonu Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Madhu Ranjan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.
On the case being taken up in the revised list, no-one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the instant bail application filed in Sessions Trial No.520 of 2011 arising out of Case Crime No.237 of 2010, under Sections 498-A,304-B,506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Sehramau, District Pilibhit. Learned AGA is present.
The present bail application has been filed in the year 2017 seeking bail in the aforesaid offence. The non-appearance of the learned counsel for the applicant demonstrates that the applicant is not interested to pursue the remedy. The present bail application cannot be allowed to dilate sine die in the camouflage of its pendency as mere long pendency of the bail application would not serve any purpose.
The bail application is accordingly dismissed.
A copy of this order be sent to the court below through FAX within a week.
Order Date :- 14.9.2018 M. Tariq
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sonu Singh
Coram
Naheed Ara Moonis
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/33911/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court