Kranti Kumar Singh @ Biru v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24936 of 2016
Applicant :- Kranti Kumar Singh @ Biru Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Prakash Chandra Srivastav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.17 of 2016, under sections 363/302/201/376 IPC read with section 3/4 of POCSO, Police Station Kaptanganj, District Azamgarh during the pendency of trial.
On the case being taken up, no-one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the bail application. Learned AGA is present.
The present bail application has been oscillating since the year 2015 with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the pendency of trial. Mere pendency of the bail application will not accrue any right in favour of the applicant. The bail application cannot be kept pending sine die in the absence of any favourable order operating in his favour. Special significance has been given to speedy and fair trial whereby the life and liberty of the applicant can be preserved.
In the light of above, the bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the court below through FAX forthwith to proceed with the matter in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 13.9.2018 Naim
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application must be taken up afresh when the applicant is absent despite prior representations?
Kranti Kumar Singh @ Biru
State Of U.P.
Naheed Ara Moonis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court