Allowed

amar singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC14 Aug 2018BAIL/3335/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed bail to Amar Singh, an applicant already on bail in a gang case, citing false implication and lack of trial tampering. Bail granted subject to personal bond, sureties, and standard conditions against witness tampering and re-offending.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed by personal bond and two sureties with conditions against tampering, intimidation, absconding, and commission of similar offences.

amar singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 41 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3335 of 2018 Applicant :- Amar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Singh,Chandra Shekhar Mishra,Mohd. Naushad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶3

Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶5

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to gang chart, one case had been shown against accused applicant and he is on bail. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 19.9.2017 (about eleven months) and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. It is further submitted that no bail cancellation application has been moved till today regarding the cases shown in the gang chart.

¶6

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶7

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶8

Let the applicant Amar Singh involved in Case Crime No. 556 of 2017, under Section 3 (1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Syohara, District - Bijnor be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶9

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶10

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶11

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶12

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶13

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 14.8.2018/OP

amar singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

amar singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Vs State of U.P.

Shankar Vs State of U.P.

Raj Pal Vs State

Sonu Ali Vs State of U.P.

Imran Vs State of U.P.

Nanda @ Nand Lal Vs State of U.P. and Others