Raj Pal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear to press the criminal miscellaneous writ petition. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order was vacated.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 605 of 1990
Petitioner :- Raj Pal Respondent :- State Counsel for Petitioner :- B.B. Paul,A.P.Paul Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned immediately to proceed with the trial.
Order Date :- 13.8.2018 NS
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raj Pal
- respondent
State
Coram
Aniruddha Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/605/1990
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court