Allowed

Narendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC31 Jul 2018BAIL/28712/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge in Criminal Misc. Bail Application allowed bail to Narendra Singh, holding that the applicant, though in jail, made out a case for bail. The court relied on principles from an Apex Court decision without expressing an opinion on merits, granting release subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond and two sureties subject to verification and compliance with standard conditions.

Narendra Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28712 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Narendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Lavkush Kumar Bhatt Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

The argument of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is not named in the first information report. He is stated to be Bank Mitra, who verified the Adhar Card of the informant. He has no criminal history to his credit and is in jail since 12.6.2018.

¶7

On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Narendra Singh involved in Case Crime No.40 of 2018, under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 467, 468, 471, I.P.C, Police Station Mohammadabad, District Farrukhabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶10

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶11

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶12

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the

¶13

date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶14

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.

¶15

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.

¶17

Order Date :- 31.7.2018 T. Sinha

Narendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Charls Naemeka Vs State of U.P.

Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Vs State of U.P.

Janvi @ Jaya Vs State of U.P.

Atul Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Iklaas Vs State of U.P.

Jafar Vs State of U.P.