Allowed

Janvi @ Jaya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC30 Jul 2018BAIL/13064/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed the bail application of Janvi alias Jaya, who was in custody since February 2018. Granting bail based on co-accused already being released without prejudice, the Court imposed standard conditions including a personal bond with two sureties and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or pressuring witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond and two sureties with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and re-offending.

Janvi @ Jaya Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13064 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Janvi @ Jaya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shivesh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶6

The argument is that the co-accused Haneef Siddiqui and Karan @ Karanveer have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 05.10.2017 & 12.07.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 33831 of 2017 and 25968 of 2018 respectively. The applicant is languishing in jail since 26.02.2018 and entitled to the benefit of Section 437 proviso 1 to section (1) Cr.P.C. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit.

¶7

On the other hand learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the fact that the identically placed co-accused has already been released on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Janvi alias Jaya , involved in case crime No.311 of 2017, under sections 386, 323, 506, 120B I.P.C, Police Station Prem Nagar, District Bareilly be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶10

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶11

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶12

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶13

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the

¶14

offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.

¶15

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.

¶17

Order Date :- 30.7.2018 SS

Janvi @ Jaya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janvi @ Jaya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit @ Lalit Vs State of U.P.

Sahid Beg and Another Vs State of U.P.

Devendra Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Jangbahadur Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Dharmveer @ Dharma Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.