Jitin v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution without the applicant appearing to press the prayer during the hearing.
What the court decided
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21158 of 2016
Applicant :- Jitin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Pathak,Sanjay Singh,Vikas Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.546 of 2014, under section 302 IPC, Police Station Meerapur, District Muzaffar Nagar during the pendency of trial.
On the case being taken up, no-one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the bail application. Learned AGA is present.
The present bail application has been oscillating since the year 2015 with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the pendency of trial. Mere pendency of the bail application will not accrue any right in favour of the applicant. The bail application cannot be kept pending sine die in the absence of any favourable order operating in his favour. Special significance has been given to speedy and fair trial whereby the life and liberty of the applicant can be preserved.
In the light of above, the bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jitin
Coram
Naheed Ara Moonis
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/21158/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court