Deepak v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court granted bail to applicant Deepak accused under IPC Sections 392, 411, 342, relying on parity with a co-accused already released on bail in the same case.
What did the court decide?
Applicant Deepak released on bail on furnishing personal bonds with two sureties each.
What the court decided
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2376 of 2018
Applicant :- Deepak Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mr Mohammad Belal Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Mohammad Belal, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Poonam Singh Sengar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the coaccused Ashu Kumar have been granted bail by this Court on 16.1.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1762 of 2018, a copy of said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 10.11.2017.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail on grounds of parity with a co-accused who was already released on bail in the same case.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Deepak
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/2376/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court