Allowed

Sandeep Maan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Jan 2018BAIL/2088/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the applicant, Sandeep Maan, accused under various sections of the IPC and the Excise Act. The court finds prima facie satisfaction of the charge but releases the accused on personal bond with sufficient sureties after assessing the nature of the accusation.)

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the applicant on personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount.

Sandeep Maan Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2088 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Sandeep Maan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri R.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicant also submitted that the applicant is the driver of the car and there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. There is also no cogent evidence against the applicant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been place forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.11.2017. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Let the applicant Sandeep Maan involved in Case Crime No. 482 of 2017, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and 60(1) Excise Act, Police Station

¶10

Pilua, District Etah be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶11

The applicant will continue to attend and cooperate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶15

Order Date :- 19.1.2018

¶16

Sumaira

Sandeep Maan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Maan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manpal Vs State of U.P.

Sarita Vs State of U.P.

Kuldeep Vs State of U.P.

Sharif and Another Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Singh @ Ajju Vs State of U.P.

Jugal Kishor Ahirwar and Another Vs State of U.P.