Allowed

Meghnath and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Jun 2018BAIL/22429/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application filed by Meghnath and another challenging their detention under sections 323, 324, 308 and 504 IPC. Court granted bail subject to personal bond, two sureties, and conditions regarding witness tampering and criminal activity.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence, cooperate in trial and not commit further crimes.

Meghnath and Another Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 33

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22429 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Meghnath And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anjani Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. It is also submitted that the applicant has not committed the present offence.He does not have any criminal history to his credit. Applicant is languishing in jail since 05.05.2018 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶6

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will misuse the liberty of bail. Having considered the submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Meghnath and Siyaram involved in Case Crime No. 706 of 2016, u/s 323, 324, 308, 504 I.P.C. PS - Tirwa, District - Kannauj be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶7

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the

¶8

investigation or trial.

¶9

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶10

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶11

Order Date :- 19.6.2018

¶12

Meghnath and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meghnath and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shravan Kumar Pal Vs State of U.P.

Pravesh Vs State of U.P.

Omkar Singh Vs State of U.P.

Vikas Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P.

Shailesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Vipin Chauhan and Another Vs State of U.P.