Veer Pal Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant in Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 16929 of 2014 was absent. The Hon'ble Judge rejected the second bail application without stating reasons.
The applicant in Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 16929 of 2014 was absent. The Hon'ble Judge rejected the second bail application without stating reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16929 of 2014
Applicant :- Veer Pal Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- R.P. Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
This is the second bail application.
No one is present on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application even in the revised call.
The bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 4.1.2018 Faridul
Veer Pal Singh
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court