Allowed

Ichcha Ram v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2018BAIL/1317/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1317 of 2018, the High Court granted bail to the applicant, Ichcha Ram, invoked on parity with a co-accused who had previously been released. The court appointed conditions including personal bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bonds and two sureties on the conditions of not tampering with evidence, not intimidating witnesses, and appearing before the trial court.

Ichcha Ram Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1317 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Ichcha Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Tripathi,Jitendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the coaccused Pappan Tripathi have been granted bail by another Bench of this Court on 4.1.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.40305 of 2017, a copy of said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has no previous criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 3.10.2017.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Let the applicant Ichcha Ram involved in S.S.T. No.32 of 2006, under Section 395 IPC. Police Station Kotwali Farrukhabad, District Farrukhabad be released on bail on his furnishing personal bonds with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶11

(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶12

(iii) The applicant will appear before the trial Court on the date fixed.

¶13

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 11.1.2018 Dev/-

Ichcha Ram v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ichcha Ram v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satendra Singh Alias Lala Vs State of U.P.

Naushad Vs State of U.P.

Tarkeshwar Nath Chaubey Vs State of U.P.

Chandan Vs State of U.P.

Son @ Sagun Singh Kushwaha Vs State of U.P.

Hari Nath Pal and Another Vs State of U.P.