Allowed

Naushad v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Jan 2018BAIL/1054/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge granted bail to the applicant in a criminal case under IPC Sections 380 and 411. The court found prima facie satisfaction of the charge and reasons favoring release, including the absence of prior criminal record and willingness to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond with two sureties subject to conditions regarding attendance, witness tampering, and legal activities.

Naushad Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1054 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Naushad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Tripathi,Vinod Kumar Tirpathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to old enmity. It is further submitted that recovery which has been shown from the possession of the applicant is planted one. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 18.11.2017. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no previous criminal history.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Let the applicant Naushad involved in Case Crime No.248 of 2017, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Mandawali, District Bijnor be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶10

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶11

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶12

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶13

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 10.1.2018

¶16

Dev/-

Naushad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naushad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Varun Kanaujiya and Another Vs State of U.P.

Arman Vs State of U.P.

Satendra Singh Alias Lala Vs State of U.P.

Tarkeshwar Nath Chaubey Vs State of U.P.

Saddam and Another Vs State of U.P.