Allowed

Dharmveer @ Dharma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC30 Jul 2018BAIL/26367/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 26367 of 2018, the Court allowed bail to the applicant, who was in jail since 12.3.2018, after considering his explanation of criminal history and referencing a Supreme Court decision.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions regarding evidence, witness intimidation, and appearance in court.

Dharmveer @ Dharma Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26367 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Dharmveer @ Dharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The argument of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is not named in the FIR. He is in jail since 12.3.2018. Criminal history against him has been satisfactorily explained in the affidavit, filed in support of the bail application and the Supplementary Affidavit filed today.

¶8

On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Dharmveer @ Dharma involved in Case Crime No.401 of 2017, under Sections 395, 412, I.P.C, Police Station Dauki, District Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶11

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶12

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the

¶13

prosecution witness.

¶14

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶15

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.

¶16

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.

¶18

Order Date :- 30.7.2018

¶19

T. Sinha

Dharmveer @ Dharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmveer @ Dharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit @ Lalit Vs State of U.P.

Sahid Beg and Another Vs State of U.P.

Devendra Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Jangbahadur Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Pankaj Vs State of U.P.