Vikash Dubey v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 54
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11999 of 2018
Applicant :- Vikash Dubey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Samya Lal Pandey,Vidya Kant Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that all the witnesses of fact has been examined by the trial wherein all of them turned hostile.
In the circumstances, this Court does not want to interfere in the matter.
The application for bail is, accordingly, rejected.
However, the Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court-I, Jaunpur is expected to gear up the trial of Session Trial No. 195 of 2017 (State v. Vikas Dubey), under section 304-B IPC, P.S. Sureri, District Jaunpur and conclude the same latest by 31.12.2018 in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, provided the applicant fully cooperates in conclusion of the trial.
Office is directed to transmit a certified copy of this order to the court concerned within a fortnight.
Order Date :- 10.8.2018 shailesh
Vikash Dubey
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court