Allowed

Anil @ Ganja v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Sept 2018BAIL/10958/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10958 of 2018 before Court No. 41, the Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh, J. allowed bail to the applicant Anil @ Ganja charged under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, subject to strict conditions and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed for the applicant in Case Crime No. 1108 of 2016 upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

Anil @ Ganja Vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 41

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10958 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Anil @ Ganja Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to gang chart, five cases had been shown against accused applicant and in four cases, he is on bail and in one case, he was convicted. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 20.1.2016 (near about tow years and eight months) and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. It is further submitted that no bail cancellation application has been moved till today regarding the cases shown in the gang chart.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail and admitted that there is no criminal history against the applicant except the gang chart and further he could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Anil @ Ganja involved in Case Crime No. 1108 of 2016, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Sadar Bazar, District - Agra be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶10

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶11

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶12

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶13

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶14

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 13.9.2018

¶17

A. Singh

Anil @ Ganja v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil @ Ganja v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Ram Sanehi @ Terhwa Vs State of U.P.

Sangeeta and Others Vs State of U.P. and Others

Raghubir and Others Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sonu Alias Mukul Pathak Vs State of U.P.